Connect with us

fight news

I won my fight for free speech at the Supreme Court, but it’s a victory for all of us – Fox News

Published

on





This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper.
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg suggested Sunday that Lorie Smith, who the Supreme Court ruled in favor of on Friday, got into the wedding business to provoke "cases like this." 
Last Friday, my seven-year journey to secure freedom from government censorship ended in a remarkable victory from the U.S. Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. Elenis. It was a day I’ll never forget. As tears of joy streamed down my face, I thought about how this decision is a victory for all of us. 
 
The Supreme Court said the United States is “a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.” That means, regardless of whether you agree with my beliefs, you are free to speak consistent with the core of who you are. 
This is true whether you are an atheist or a Christian, a Democrat or Republican, a supporter of same-sex marriage or someone who identifies as LGBT. 
SENATOR LANKFORD CLAIMS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ‘NOT GOING TO PROTECT THE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY’ OF CITIZENS
 
We will all disagree about something at some point. And that’s OK. Disagreement is not discrimination. The Supreme Court made very clear that the government can’t falsely label our speech as discrimination in order to censor it. This should be welcome news for everyone, because censorship is like poisonous gas. When the winds shift, it can harm any of us. 
Lorie Smith, owner of 303 Creative, poses at her studio in Littleton, United States on Nov. 15, 2022. (Rachel Woolf for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Sadly, some egregious falsehoods are being spread about me and my case. I want to set the record straight. 
First, I love and serve everyone, regardless of sexual orientation. I have clients who identify as LGBT. I always have, and I always will. This isn’t disputed: Colorado, the lower courts, and now the U.S. Supreme Court all agree with this truth. 
Second, I firmly believe no one should be denied services based on who they are. That’s why I’ve always decided whether to create a project based on what message is requested, never who is asking.  
There are some messages I can’t create no matter who asks, including certain political messages and messages that would disparage people, including those who identify as LGBT. Again, Colorado, the lower courts and the Supreme Court agreed. 
The Supreme Court explicitly and repeatedly stated that, under its decision, no Americans will be discriminated against, and no one will be forced to say things they don’t believe. 
 
Third, there’s also been some deeply painful and despicable allegations about a request I received shortly after I filed my pre-enforcement lawsuit in September 2016. When I received the request through my contact form on September 21, 2016 (the day after I filed my lawsuit), I had no reason to believe it wasn’t genuine.  
After all, it was a request from Stewart and Mike for a wedding website. As I’ve always done with all wedding-related requests, I didn’t respond, because I knew Colorado could punish me for doing so (just like officials did to Jack Phillips when he responded to a similar request). 
 
But whether this particular request was genuine or whether I was being baited, I’ll never know. I receive a lot of requests — some appear genuine as this one did, and I’m also trolled regularly.  But it didn’t matter then — and it doesn’t matter now — to the integrity and veracity of my pre-enforcement case. 
Jack Phillips, who won his case with the Supreme Court five years ago after he objected to designing a wedding cake for a gay couple, speaks to supporters outside the Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 5, 2022.  (AP)
Colorado was violating my constitutional rights, so I filed a perfectly legitimate pre-enforcement lawsuit through my attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom. Full stop. I chose to file a pre-enforcement case because I knew Colorado could punish me if I created art consistent with my beliefs about marriage just like it has repeatedly gone after cake artist Jack Philips.  
Rather than wait in fear and trepidation to be sued by Colorado or activists, I decided free speech is worthy of protecting, and I didn’t want to be muzzled by my own government. 
 
Thankfully, the Supreme Court said Colorado couldn’t do that to me. And the government can’t do that to you either, explained the ruling: “The opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties and part of what keeps our Republic strong.” 
 
Despite this victory, I continue to face horrific attacks — people saying they wish I was dead, that I’d be raped, that they want to burn my house to the ground, that they know where I live and want to come kill my family, and the list goes on.  
My 303 Creative website crashed over the weekend because I was getting so many hateful and bigoted messages and requests for websites that would make your skin crawl. 
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER
 
But despite desperate attempts to malign me and my victory at the Supreme Court, I choose to exercise the Golden Rule that, if we want freedom for ourselves, we must defend it for others — including the people who disagree with my beliefs. After all, the Supreme Court protected their free-speech rights, too. 
 
As someone who used to be a supporter of same-sex marriage, I know the significance of being free to speak consistent with what we believe. While my beliefs on marriage have changed, I want you to have the freedom to speak consistent with yours. 
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 
This beautiful freedom is what makes this great country free and not a totalitarian regime like so many of our ancestors endured. 
 
I hope you will actually read the Supreme Court’s decision in my case and make up your own mind. Don’t believe the fake news and deceptive news stories you see online. I hope you will also join me in being a good neighbor, treating those around us with a basic, mutual respect, and loving everyone, knowing that we are all freer today than we were yesterday. 
Lorie Smith is the owner of 303 Creative near Denver, Colorado.
Get the recap of top opinion commentary and original content throughout the week.
Subscribed
You’ve successfully subscribed to this newsletter!
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper.

source



fight news

UFC schedule, fight cards, start times, odds, how to watch Song Yadong vs. Chris Gutierrez – Yahoo Sports

Published

on





UFC schedule, fight cards, start times, odds, how to watch Song Yadong vs. Chris Gutierrez  Yahoo Sports
source



Continue Reading

fight news

UFC Schedule 2023: Every Fight & Major Event Happening This Year – Sports Illustrated

Published

on





UFC Schedule 2023: Every Fight & Major Event Happening This Year  Sports Illustrated
source



Continue Reading

fight news

What time is Anthony Joshua vs Robert Helenius today? Schedule, main card start time for 2023 boxing fight – Sporting News

Published

on





Former two-time heavyweight champ Anthony Joshua is determined to stay active, so when old foe Dillian Whyte was pulled from the O2 Arena card at just seven days’ notice, the immediate goal was to find AJ a replacement opponent.
Whyte failed a VADA test, so a long-awaited rematch with Joshua went down the drain, conceivably with his career as a serious heavyweight contender. Replacing him will be former two-time European champion Robert Helenius, who knocked off some ring rust on Saturday past by posting a third-round stoppage of the unknown Mika Mielonen.
WATCH: Anthony Joshua vs. Robert Helenius, live on DAZN
The good news is that Helenius is in fighting shape. The bad news is he’s been installed as a +1000 underdog to derail Joshua, who is looking for some ring time ahead of a potential showdown with former WBC champion Deontay Wilder.
Will Joshua swat Helenius aside and face “The Bronze Bomber”, or will “The Nordic Nightmare” produce one of the biggest upsets in heavyweight history?
Here’s all you need to know about Joshua vs. Helenius, including viewing details, prices, and more.
Joshua vs. Helenius will be on August 12.  The main card starts at 7 p.m. local time, which is 2 p.m. ET and 11 a.m. PT.
Both fighters should make their way to the ring at around 10.15 p.m. BST (5.15 p.m. ET, 2.15 p.m. PT), depending on how long the undercard fights last. Here’s how that translates to different timezones globally: 
MORE: Wait, so why is Fury-Ngannou happening?
The Anthony Joshua vs. Robert Helenius fight card will be available via DAZN in the U.S. and DAZN PPV in the U.K.
Now available as a Sky channel, DAZN 1 HD is exclusive to Sky.
WATCH: Anthony Joshua vs. Robert Helenius, live on DAZN
Joshua vs. Helenius takes place at the O2 Arena in London. The arena can hold up to 20,000 people.
Per SkyBet, Anthony Joshua is the -2000 favorite, while Robert Helenius is the +1000 underdog. 
MORE: How to bet on combat sports
Ben Miller is a content producer for The Sporting News.

source



Continue Reading

Trending