fight news
8 Differences Between 'Fight Club' and the Original Novel – Collider
“This is your life, and it’s ending one minute at a time.”
Fight Club is David Fincher’s brilliant satirical film that continues to generate conversations and wonder 24 years later. At the core of an identity crisis is the melancholy white-collar Narrator (Edward Norton), who befriends Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt) and finds himself so eager to be like the rambunctious character, that he loses track of himself. Quirky, cynical, and artistic in the best ways, Fight Club is a film that needs no introduction, nor a sequel to carry on its greatness.
And yet, the iconic movie has not become synonymous with it’s equally dynamic roots, with the original novel, ‘Fight Club’ less popular despite the three-year difference in publication. The novel, written by Chuck Palahniuk in 1996, turns a man with insomnia into a co-creator of an unconventional form of psychotherapy, and was the blueprint that the movie manifested out. While the 1999 film adaptation remains fairly faithful to the novel’s plot, some aspects of characterization, plot points, and overall significance have been altered in the on-screen remake.
David Fincher’s Fight Club is well-known for pushing an anti-capitalist, anti-consumerist agenda: promoting the idea that if viewers stripped away their possessions and monetary-based goals, they could reach a higher level of consciousness within their identity. "The things you own end up owning you” is a quote that Tyler Durden reiterates many times, arguing that identity is shaped by the realms of capitalism: that the perfectly-curated IKEA furniture and luxury clothing ends up as a defining marker of the self.
In comparison, while the novel did encapsulate the same ideology, Fight Club centred around themes of masculinity and femininity within the identity, expressed in the more pronounced love dynamic between the Narrator and Marla (played by Helena Bonham Carter in the film). The Narrator expresses traditionally ‘feminine’ traits – such as collecting furniture and feeling comfort when crying at his group therapy sessions; which he desperately wants to remove, hence his creation of a hypermasculine alter-ego. Marla on the other hand, expresses more ‘masculine’ traits, such as acting recklessly and portraying a sense of brazen confidence; which masks her truly vulnerable state where she just wants to be loved.
In the film, the Narrator first meets Tyler on a plane back from a business trip. Introducing himself as a soap salesman, Tyler impresses the Narrator with his theory that oxygen on planes serve as a means to become docile in emergency – a way to accept your fate. Eager to impress him, the Narrator refers to him as a single-serve friend; amusing Tyler with his cleverness. From the point of meeting Tyler, the Narrator is invigorated and obsessed with pleasing Tyler in any way he can, blindly following him and adopting his radical ideologies even though they clash with his original senses of purpose.
In the novel, the Narrator heads to a nudist beach, and awakes to find Tyler placing logs on the shore, strategically creating the palm of a hand through the shadow of the afternoon sun. This encounter depicts Tyler as a spiritual leader on the brink of creationism. Guiding the Narrator on a path to enlightenment by hitting rock bottom, Tyler becomes a representation of a deity – a symbolic movement that can serve as a critique on blind following and manipulation when a person is idolized.
Arguments have ensured whether the Fight Club film is a love story, or whether Marla serves as nothing more than a desirable object for the Narrator, and an obstacle for Tyler. Although the audience can see that the Narrator wishes to be with her, despite his annoyance that she too pretends to have illnesses to seek comfort, one cannot deny that Marla primarily serves as an antagonist in both the Narrator and Tyler’s eyes. Asides from her sexual relationship with Tyler, Marla remains volatile to the Narrator, not understanding his personality change just as he does not realize it himself.
In the novel, Fight Club distinguishes itself more within the romance genre, despite Marla and Tyler’s sexual relationship. Throughout the novel, Marla and the Narrator’s budding relationship builds slowly into an emotional intimacy, and the creation of Tyler is nothing more than the Narrator’s attempts to be a ‘man’ that he believes will entice Marla into his life. In both the film and the novel, it is clear that Marla’s existence becomes a threat to Tyler’s existence.
The character of Tyler Durden is synonymous with Brad Pitt’s chiselled, suave exterior; a handsome face that ironically intends to fight back against capitalist-driven ideas of masculinity. He is a preacher of anarchy; being psychologically cold and brazen in his actions, for he does not fear consequences. But, at the same time, Tyler is charismatic: he is designed to be a likeable character that the audience can be entertained by. Those around him are easily persuaded by his ideologies, to the point where he commands such attention that no one ever tries to contest his orders.
In the novel, Tyler Durden is a darker character that very quickly becomes the forefront of the reader’s attention. A free-spirit, Tyler firmly lives by the idea that most things truly do not matter, and therefore morals can be abandoned when dealing with them. This leads to him being capable of harm, such as murdering a man at a murder-mystery party, and leading a terrorist organization. He promotes an aggressive, primal state for men to revert to, arguing that their actions are just after society has expected too much of them.
In Fight Club, Marla Singer is a character viewers meet even before Tyler, causing the Narrator great distress as she involves herself in the same therapy groups as a means of socialization and a cure for boredom. In the film, she is sort of a femme fatale; the main source of antagonism for both the Narrator and Tyler – the latter of which sees her as a threat to his existence. Marla is the quirky side character who is not given any background information – leaving viewers to take her as she presents.
While she is a love interest to the Narrator, their complicated relationship holds viewers back from knowing her as anything else. In the book, Marla is slightly more fleshed out, with her background being as having worked in a funeral home. Unkempt, cold, and suicidal, Marla grows throughout the novel as her connection to Tyler/the Narrator develops, becoming softer and more caring. Due to her vulnerability, the Narrator slowly showcases his true self to her; thus causing her greater pain when he becomes confused in his own persona. Marla does not just serve as a complicated love interest in the novel; instead, she becomes a reason for the Narrator to want to diverge away from Tyler when he realizes that Tyler wants her gone.
As the adaption of Fight Club had a discerning anti-consumerist message behind it, some parts of the movie were altered with that perspective in mind. Throughout the film, Project Mayhem engages in many illegal activities that reap havoc as a means of fighting against capitalist signifiers of success – using bird poo to soil luxury cars and removing iconic statues. As a political agenda and a marker of freedom, Tyler orders Project Mayhem to detonate several buildings – all of which are owned by major credit card companies.
In doing so, Tyler’s ultimate goal is to erase the debt record; ultimately attempting to destroy the class system by making everyone equal by having nothing and owing nothing. However, in the original Fight Club, Project Mayhem’s final blow played out a little differently, showcasing Tyler’s truly dark intentions. Planning to blow up a nearby skyscraper, Tyler aimed for the natural museum to be the explosion point, creating a ‘historic’ point in which he, a martyr of some sorts, will die. As a final damning act, Tyler aims to take alongside him, the Narrator’s life; leaking behind a legacy of the greatest anarchist that Project Mayhem will live vicariously through.
At it’s core, both versions of Fight Club is a coming-of-age story; not through gaining maturity, but through awakening to the realization that the Narrator does have a choice in life to live the way he desires. The Narrator’s turning point in the movie comes with the realization that Tyler Durden was nothing more than an alter-ego that ran rampant as the Narrator slept. As the Narrator begins to resent the level of violence enacted by Project Mayhem, Tyler disappears, leaving the Narrator in charge.
It is here that he realizes that members of Project Mayhem and Marla address him as Mr. Durden/Tyler. For the rest of the film, it is the Narrator who attempts to mediate between his two personalities, until he is able to disassociate from Tyler altogether. In the ‘Fight Club’ novel, the Narrator reaches a state of consciousness thanks to his budding relationship with Marla, in which becomes his motivation to take back control of himself. At one point, the Narrator wonders if Tyler and Marla are the same person, for they are never seen in the same room together; which his loyalties start to become swayed. When Marla says something to the Narrator that reveals that she believes that he and Tyler are the same person, the Narrator begins to track down Tyler. The Narrator’s concern for Marla’s safety and his desire for a relationship allows him to disassociate from Tyler.
The ending scene of Fight Club, in all its chaotic glory, is satisfying, and wildly symbolic of the Narrator’s explosive revelation that he has been living a double life. Knowing that only he has the true power to make Tyler disappear, the Narrator shoots himself in the cheek, causing Tyler to vanish into thin air. Marla runs in, and tends to his wound. The Narrator exclaims that she met in a strange time in his life, before turning to watch the other buildings outside explode.
In contrast, Marla’s significance becomes cemented in the novel’s ending, and the Narrator’s mental health is truly recognized.Tyler’s plan is to let the skyscraper fall onto a nearby museum that will also blow up, killing both Tyler and the Narrator, with Tyler wanting to die as a historical figure. However, Marla and one of the support groups comes rushing in, and Tyler vanishes. The Narrator awaits for the explosion to kill him, only for it to malfunction. Feeling like he has control for the first time in a long time, the Narrator shoots himself in the mouth. Some time later in a mental institute, a group of hospital employees come to his side and present themselves as members of Project Mayhem, assuring him that the plans will continue, and that they eagerly await for Tyler’s return.
Aleisha Brown is a young writer from Perth, Western Australia. She developed her literary skills through a Bachelor of Arts in Creative Writing + Professional Writing and Publishing from Curtin University. When not writing articles, she enjoys writing poetry, reading fictional realism, and a *touch* of online shopping.
fight news
'They could have killed my son.' Mom calling SROs to return after … – KSTP
A fight inside Mankato East High School last week Friday is re-igniting the debate over school resource officers in Minnesota. In a video taken in the hallways of the school building, school officials say about 10 students were involved in that brawl. One of the students assaulted was Nashawn William’s son.
“I was upset,” said Williams. “He had a blood clot in his right eye at the bottom and his upper torso was swollen…They could have killed my son stomping him on the floor, like you all saw the video, they could have killed my son.”
The fight comes after Supt. Paul Peterson told families in an email this month that “SROs will not be physically located at MAPS schools but will be available on an ‘on call’ basis to assist school staff.”
Scott Hare, Director of Student Support Services with Mankato Area Public Schools, said police were called in to break up the fight. He added that if an SRO had been in the building, the situation would have looked different.
“Having an officer on site, they’re right there. It’s very fast. It will take a couple of minutes for other officers to arrive through 911,” said Hare. “An SRO can read the situation and make the correct judgment call on the type of support that they would need to bring in.”
A new law prohibits SROs from placing a student in a face-down position and bans certain holds on the head, neck and across most of the torso. Besides Mankato, at least a dozen other law enforcement agencies have pulled their SROs across the state arguing the law would prevent them from doing their job.
RELATED: Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association meets with attorney general over new school resource officer law
“Once you take that presence out of the school, everybody feels like they can run around because they know the teachers can’t do anything,” said Williams.
Elizabeth Hanke is a parent within the school district and believes the state is overreaching by getting involved with placing policies at schools.
“We need more local government and community involvement. We need to give authority and agency back to our teachers and police officers, and still be able to hold them accountable for when they’re not doing their jobs effectively,” said Hanke.
Last month, Attorney General Keith Ellison said what’s written in the law is clear, however, Governor Tim Walz’s office tells 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS Walz remains open to a special session addressing this matter.
Any person with disabilities who needs help accessing the content of the FCC Public File may contact KSTP via our online form or call 651-646-5555
This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
© KSTP-TV, LLC
A Hubbard Broadcasting Company

KSTP Follow
fight news
Boxing News: Fight Week » September 26, 2023 – Fight News
The last Fight Week prior to the mega Fulton-Inoue/Spence-Crawford showdowns offers up some interesting action.
FRIDAY
Thompson Boxing sadly bids farewell after 23 years of promoting boxing in Southern California. Their final show is headlined by welterweight Louie Lopez (13-2-1, 4 KOs) against an opponent TBA. You can catch the action on YouTube and Facebook.
SATURDAY
ESPN presents former undisputed lightweight champion George “Ferocious” Kambosos Jr. (20-2, 10 KOs) against Maxi Hughes (26-5-2, 5 KOs) in a twelve round IBF world title eliminator from the FireLake Arena in Shawnee, Oklahoma.
UFC Fightpass has exciting junior middleweight KO artist Serhii “El Flaco” Bohachuk (22-1, 22 KOs) against former world title challenger Patrick Allotey (42-4, 32 KOs) at the Chumash Casino Resort in Santa Ynez, California.
ProBox TV has a pro fight card from the Radisson Victoria Plaza in Montevideo, Uruguay, with middleweight Amilcar Vidal Jr (16-1, 12 KOs) rebounding from his first loss against Domicio Rondon (17-5, 11 KOs).
So we have a fighter from Australia against a UK fighter at a venue on Oklahoma. Looks like this one will go the distance!
My thoughts (re the fighters and venue) exactly but why do you think that this means a distance fight?
Am I ridiculous for thinking that Hughes has a chance in this one, Pete?? He’s been on a nice little run as of late against some decent guys including a former world champion, albeit a blown-up featherweight.
I was just thinking the same. Maxi is on a nice run; If you take away the win against a mentally and physically compromised Teo, has George done much?
Getting whitewashed against Haney twice and close wins against Bet and Selby doesn’t make a great resume. I think Maxi is a live dog.
Don’ think so-has five losses and not much KO power. Kambosos pretty average as well but should have enough to beat this guy.
Only time he got f’d up was vs someone who wore Reyes gloves. As long as Kambosos isn’t wearing those, Hughes may not be psyched out. He like kept the Reyes gloves and showed them off about how much he hated the padding and feel to them. It was in a YouTube video.
I think he does have a chance. I always felt the stars aligned perfect for Kambosos when he fought Lopez. Lopez was overconfident and fought a fight that gave Kambosos a chance. Plus he was better at taking Lopez’s power then we thought which I also think caught Lopez off guard. Other then that, like Streetgang said…what else has he really done that separates him from Hughes? I maybe in the minority but I thought Selby beat him.
So yes I think Hughes could outpoint him. I am not sure if that is my pick but it is a reasonable outcome. Just to clarify when I earlier said it would go the distance I was referring to their KO % …that comment had nothing to do with the venue which I do not think will be relevant as to whether it goes the distance or not.
I remember the Selby fight and thinking it was close but Lee may have nicked it.
I will be pulling for Maxi, George has become a bit unbearable for me.
I think I might just take this week off and just save the excitement for next weekend
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
fight news
Boxing News: IBF Convention Slated to Start this Weekend … – Fight News
The IBF’s 38th Annual Convention will kick off this weekend at The Fairmont Chicago Millennium Park, in Chicago, Illinois from May 28 – June 1, 2023. After 38 years, the organization will be returning to the Midwest to celebrate the IBF’s 40th year. The IBF celebrated its 2nd Annual Convention in Dearborn, Michigan in 1985 and a return to the region is long overdue. “We are excited for this milestone event and are looking forward to gathering with the boxing community in Chicago and the Midwest,” said IBF President Daryl Peoples.
During the convention the IBF hosts several events and seminars. Notably, the IBF also presents annual awards at each convention, and proudly announces its top award recipients for 2022 to be presented at the Awards Banquet closing the organization’s convention festivities on Wednesday, May 31, 2023. The IBF is proud to announce some of it’s top awards for 2022 in anticipation of the upcoming convention.
Jersey Joe Walcott Award
The Jersey Joe Walcott Award, the organization’s highest honor, will go to Naoya Inoue. In spectacular fashion, Inoue unified the Bantamweight division with a second-round knockout win over Nonito Donaire. Naoya won the IBF title in 2019 and defended six times.
Female Fighter of the Year
Receiving the IBF Female Fighter of the Year Award is Chantelle Cameron who unified the Female Jr. Welterweight division. Cameron put on an exciting performance when she beat Undisputed Welterweight Champion Jessica McCaskill by unanimous decision and became the Undisputed Champion in the division.
Fight of the Year
IBF– Sivenathi Nontshinga vs. Hector Flores
Female – Katie Taylor vs. Amada Serrano
Intercontinental – Mark Heffron vs. Lennox Clarke
USBA – Robeisy Ramirez vs. Abraham Nova
Jessica McCaskill and Murodjon Akhmadaliev are recieving Championship Rings for 3 successful title defenses.
“We proudly celebrate the notable achievements and remarkable careers of our champions, and the boxers that participated in IBF title fights. These are very well-deserved distinctions as all these fighters have worked incredibly hard to attain these accomplishments. We look forward to celebrating them,” noted Daryl Peoples.
-
fight news2 weeks ago
10 Facts You Probably Didn't Know About “Fight Club” (1999) – High On Films
-
fight news Canada4 months ago
Fight News 2023: Exciting Matchups
-
fight news3 weeks ago
Movies in North Texas theaters on Sept. 1 and coming soon – The Dallas Morning News
-
fight news3 months ago
Kota Miura vs. Joker Fight Club: Date, start time, TV channel and live … – dazn.com
-
fight news3 months ago
2023 Detroit Lions Name Bracket Tournament: Round 1, Part 3 – Pride Of Detroit
-
fight news Canada3 months ago
Get the Inside Scoop on Canadian Boxing with Fightnews.ca
-
fight news3 months ago
Boxing News, Results, Schedule, Rankings » Fightnews.com™ – Fight News
-
fight news Canada4 months ago
Get the Latest Scoop on Fight News